Quality Profiles homepage Click here - link to www.ncqa.org
Quality Profiles homepageQuality Profiles case studiesQP Leadership SeriesQuality Initiative Activity ToolsQuality Initiative Activity Form Useful Quality Initiative Links and Resources
home / leadership series / diabetes / value of effective diabet... November 20th, 2008 
Value of Effective Diabetes Management and Prevention
Economic Impact of Diabetes
Value of Prevention
Conclusion
References
FOCUS ON DIABETES
Table of Contents
A Joint Message From NCQA and Pfizer
A Word About Quality of Care in Diabetes
Introduction
What Is the Current State of Quality of Care in Diabetes?
Diabetes Prevention
Managing Diabetes Complications
Addressing the Quality Gaps
Value of Effective Diabetes Management
A Look to the Future

Value of Effective Diabetes Management and Prevention

The costs for treating diabetes are rising: direct medical expenditures were estimated at $92 billion in 2002, compared with $44 billion in 1997. In 2002, the breakdown for costs included[1]:

  • 44% for inpatient hospital care
  • 15% for nursing home care
  • 11% for physician office visits

Based on direct costs alone, health care organizations have the financial incentive to improve diabetes quality of care.


Economic Impact of Diabetes

It comes as no surprise that health care costs for people with diabetes are higher than for those without diabetes. In 2002, per capita medical expenditures totaled $13,243 for people with diabetes versus $2,560 for people without diabetes.[1]

The indirect costs of diabetes were estimated to be another $40 billion in 2002, due to lost workdays, restricted-activity days, mortality, and permanent disability[1]:

  • Nearly 88 million days lost to disability[2]
  • 176,000 cases of permanent disability, at a cost of $7.5 billion[2]

The combined estimated cost of $132 billion underestimates the total economic impact of diabetes. It accounts neither for care provided by nonpaid caregivers, nor for other areas of health care spending where people with diabetes use services at higher rates than people without diabetes, such as dental care, optometry care, and the use of licensed dietitians. The cost estimate also excludes undiagnosed cases of diabetes. These costs alone do not quantify the impact on quality of life for patients with diabetes and their families.[1]


Value of Diabetes Management

Strategies discussed in this edition of Quality Profiles™: The Leadership Series that help improve quality and outcomes may also help control costs. These include:

  • Focusing on improving glycemic control
  • Managing the risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • Using disease management programs to facilitate comprehensive care

Economic Case for Improving Glycemic Control

Macrovascular complications account for 52% of the costs of managing diabetes over the long term.[3] Although intensive management of blood glucose was estimated to cost about $4,500 per patient per year in 2002,[4] it results in cost savings over the long term. In one HMO, total health care costs decreased every year for three years for patients with diabetes whose A1c dropped 1% or more during the first year and who sustained the decrease.[5] The greatest cost savings for the first year was in those whose A1c was between 8% and 10% at the beginning of the study. By the third year, the greatest cost savings was in those whose A1c was less than 8% at baseline.[5] The lower costs resulted from fewer primary health care visits and specialty visits and was unaffected by the presence of complications at baseline.[5]

In a clinic serving primarily managed care patients, better glycemic control reduced hospital admissions for acute complications of diabetes, such as infections, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and electrolyte disturbances.[6] Diabetic patients whose A1c was between 8% and 10% had about half the number of hospital stays at about half the cost over three years as those whose A1c level was over 10%.[6]

Intensive glycemic control has been shown to be cost effective for type 1 diabetes and more recently for type 2 diabetes. In the UKPDS, patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes who received intensive treatment for hyperglycemia (sulfonylureas or insulin) cost more to treat than those who received only diet counseling, but the cost of treatment was largely offset by the reduced cost of complications.[7] Hospitalizations accounted for the largest element of complications costs, and most of the savings in this area were due to shorter stays. Savings were also due to increased time free of complications.


Economic Case for Managing Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease

CVD is an even stronger predictor of future costs in diabetes than A1c levels.[8] In a model based on existing studies of the costs of managing diabetes complications over 30 years, CVD was by far the most costly component (Figure 1).[3]

While hyperglycemia is believed to contribute directly to atherosclerosis (and therefore to CVD), hypertension and dyslipidemia are certain risk factors for CVD.[9] Therefore, a focus on managing these conditions in patients with diabetes is likely to result in improved quality of life and lower long-term costs.


Figure 1. Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Costs of Managing Diabetes Complications[3]
Complication Cost Over 30 Years
Cardiovascular disease 52%
Nephropathy 21%
Neuropathy 17%
Retinopathy 10%



Economic Case for Managing Overweight and Obesity

Obesity outranks both smoking and alcohol consumption in its harmful effects on health and in driving health care costs.[10] The cost of treating overweight patients with diabetes is about one and a half times that of treating normal-weight patients with diabetes. The cost of treating patients with diabetes who are obese is more than three times as high as for treating patients without diabetes who are of normal weight.[11] One fourth of the growth in health care spending between 1987 and 2001 was for treating people who are obese. Of this, treating diabetes accounted for 38%, treating CVD for 41%, and treating hyperlipidemia for 22%.[11]

Weight loss as small as 10% is associated with substantially reduced health care costs, reduced incidence of obesity-related comorbid conditions, and increased lifetime expectancy.[12] In one HMO, members who lost 11% of their weight and kept it off for two years, but then gradually regained it by year seven, had lower health care costs over those seven years. The initial cost in year one for this group was $317 higher per person, which amounted to a total savings over seven years of $11,536 per person. Even though the treated group regained most of the weight,[12] the average annual health care costs for the control group over seven years was 50% greater than those of the treated group.


Value of Prevention

Because the costs of diabetes are so high and type 2 diabetes is often preventable, treating prediabetes may be one way to help control the rising costs of health care.[13] It is too early to know whether treating prediabetes will result in the same cost savings demonstrated by effective diabetes treatment; however, treating obesity, a risk factor for prediabetes and diabetes, is known to save money and improve quality of life.


Integrated Health Management Enhances Care and Saves Costs for One Employer

Programs to improve the health and welfare of people are not limited to health plans. In 2003, a self-insured school district took on the challenge of diabetes for its 12,000 employees and 4,000 retirees. While the school district has a third-party administrator who handles the administration of its health insurance benefits, it wanted to do more to prevent illness and promote health improvement.

In 2002, the school district examined claims data and discovered a large number of services related to obesity, heart disease, and diabetes. In one year alone, there were 78 employees with renal failure from diabetes, hypertension, or both. There were seven amputations costing on average $69,000 each, for a total of $483,000. In a single year, the school district spent $16.7 million on diabetes-related care, 18.2% of its total health care expenditures. The district spent another $10 million on cardiac care during this same period.

An initial biometric screening program implemented by the school district indicated that 15% of its employees already had diabetes and that another 27% were at high risk for developing diabetes based on blood glucose levels and insulin resistance. The school district recognized the link between obesity and diabetes. A screening program identified that 70% of its employees were obese based on body fat percentage (>25% for males and >32% for females). Given the high cost and prevalence of diabetes, along with the obesity risk factor, the school district decided to address the issue head on.

This employer believed an opportunity existed to work more closely with its employees to promote accountability in managing their own health. The goal was for workers to adopt a health-conscious lifestyle and to seek appropriate preventive services to maximize their health. The school district recognized the inherent challenges in reaching this goal, including the fact that teachers and staff are spread out among 160 schools located over a broad geographic area. Reaching all of these employees with a single set of activities would be difficult. In addition, the time restrictions based on employee work hours meant that convenient, easy-to-access services were needed. The district felt that access and incentives for its employees should be key components of the program.

A two-pronged approach was developed to address diabetes care, one focused on health promotion and the second focused on disease management.

Health Promotion

The goal of the health promotion program was to create a culture that fostered healthy decision-making skills and identified potential health risks before they reached a significant disease state. The health promotion program utilized screening through health risk appraisals, one-on-one counseling, and education for behavior modification. The program components included:

  • Health risk appraisal (required)
  • Annual biometric screening (required)
  • Educational seminars (minimum of two per year required): diabetes insulin resistance, self-care management skills, and exercise
  • Nutritional counseling (required)
  • Physical fitness testing (required)
  • Stress management seminar
  • Wellness “bucks” to be redeemed for pedometers, workout packages at fitness centers, yoga/Pilates packages, workout bags, or massage therapy

The wellness “bucks” were given to employees who annually completed the five required components of the program.

In addition, the employees could earn “wellness days off” by making lifestyle changes, providing personal testimonies on the impact of the wellness program, or by demonstrating wellness leadership at the school/worksite.

To participate in the health promotion program, schools submitted a proposal and were awarded funding through a grant. Employees at each school developed a worksite wellness team to determine how the grant money would be spent, coordinate implementation of services, and promote the initiative among the teachers. In this manner, each location tailored the wellness program to the specific needs of employees and health care services available in the area. The program was unique to the particular school and local and convenient for the workers. The wellness “bucks” and opportunity for time off provided incentives for employees to participate.

Disease Management

Disease management services were designed for employees with diabetes to promote adherence to the ADA guidelines and to build self-management skills. Discussions with employees identified that many had difficulty affording prescription medications and, without proper drug therapy, the workers’ health was at risk. The school district believed a financial incentive would be a useful motivator to improve utilization and compliance. Program content included:

  • Semiannual biometric screenings for LDL-C and A1c levels, retinal eye examinations, and foot care
  • One-on-one counseling for members identified as at risk based on screening results; an additional health risk appraisal was also completed for this group
  • Follow-up telephone contacts from health care professionals for further education and counseling for those with low health risk appraisal scores; educational materials were mailed following the telephone call
  • Eight hours of education on nutrition, diabetes management skills, fitness, and other lifestyle issues

If the employee completed all of the above services, he or she received a 50% reduction in pharmacy co-payments. Annually, the employee submitted a checklist completed by the health care providers as services were rendered. The completion of this checklist ensured an ongoing reduction of co-payments.

Outcomes

Based on completed biometric health risk appraisals, over 5,000 employees participated in the health promotion program. In addition, 21% of employees with diabetes participated in the disease management program. Considering that participation involved eight hours of education, biannual screenings, individual counseling sessions (twice per year), and other ongoing communication, this was a significant achievement. The first full year of the health promotion program yielded multiple improvements in care as evidenced through laboratory results and self-reported findings.

Of those employees enrolled in both the wellness and disease management programs, medication adherence improved 24% in one year.

The total cost for both programs in one year was approximately $700,000 for staff and materials. The savings yielded in medical expenses during this period was achieved for the employees who participated in the wellness program. At the end of the first year of implementation, claims for this group were $456 less per person compared with those employees not enrolled in the program. With approximately 5,000 workers participating, this translates into a savings of $2.2 million.

The results from the disease management program were not yet available, but even without these data, the savings from the wellness program covered the cost of the entire effort. Using a dual approach of prevention and disease management, this employer demonstrated that it is possible to achieve healthy outcomes for its workers and appropriately manage its resources.



Measure Initial Metric (2002) Follow-up Metric (2003) Change (%)
Number of employees Percentage Number of employees) Percentage
LDL <130 mg/dL 376 464.9 386 66.7 +2.7
LInsulin resistance index <2.93 313 54.1 338 58.4 +8.0
% Body fat (males >25% and females >32%) 341 30.0 388 34.0 +13.3
Self-reported sedentary lifestyle 489 43.0 251 22.0 -48.8
Self-reported smoking 102 9.0 80 7.0 -22.2


Conclusion

The disease burden to society and, in particular, to people with diabetes and their families is considerable. Eliminating or reducing the health problems caused by diabetes through better access to preventive care, more widespread diagnosis, more intensive disease management, and the use of new medical technologies could significantly improve the quality of life for people with diabetes, while reducing national spending for health care services and increasing productivity in the U.S. economy.[1]

Targeting high-cost diseases, like diabetes, for increased prevention and treatment is one method of controlling overall health care costs.[14] Better treatment requires an investment in the short term, but a study shows that the extra cost is well worth the investment.[14] Health plans that design and implement programs to improve diabetes care generate benefits for their members, physicians, employers, and their organization.[14]


An Employer Uses Its Existing Occupational Health Clinic to Improve A1c Screening and Control

A self-insured manufacturing company with 12,000 employees found that 14.4% of its employees had diabetes, which cost $21 million over a 24-month period. The employer decided to take action and began by looking at its occupational health clinic. The clinic had successfully managed to reduce workplace injuries, while worker safety continued to be a concern. The employer saw an opportunity to shift the focus from acute care to chronic care management. As a result, it began managing health care issues for its employees with diabetes in 2003.

The approach relies on several means of identification:

  • It offers a Web-based health risk assessment (HRA) (also available in hard copy), which has been used by more than 60% of its employees for screening
  • All new hires are referred to the occupational health clinic for a full assessment and are required to complete the HRA.
  • Workers who come to the clinic for injuries are also screened for diabetes.

The goal of the program is to identify people who have diabetes or are at risk for developing diabetes (based on a blood sugar level >100 mg/dL) and to help employees with diabetes maintain glycemic control. The clinic physicians and nurses provide laboratory testing, counseling, and referral to primary care physicians (PCP) for follow-up. The occupational health clinic is open 24 hours a day/seven days per week for the convenience of employees on all shifts.

Following the initial assessment, employees are encouraged to return to the clinic monthly for A1c and medication evaluation, a check for complications, and for dietary and exercise counseling. Once an employee’s diabetes is well controlled, visits become quarterly. The employer also offers diabetes classes to employees and family members who wish to learn more.

The occupational health clinic recently developed a database to track employees’ lab values and progress in meeting health care goals. All information is shared with the PCP quarterly, or more frequently if the employee’s condition warrants. The number of regular visits to the clinic indicate that the program is having a positive impact on employees’ self-management skills.

The occupational health clinic has other programs that are beneficial to the employee with diabetes, including an onsite fitness facility and programs to address smoking, cholesterol management, and hypertension. This company believes helping employees improve their own health is a worthwhile undertaking for all concerned considering the large amount of time and money invested in training and professional development of its skilled workers.



REFERENCES

1. Hogan P, Dall T. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917-932.

2. American Diabetes Association. Direct and indirect costs of diabetes in the United States. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/utils/printthispage.jsp?PageID=STATISTICS_233194. Accessed March 16, 2005.

3. Caro JJ, Ward AJ, O’Brien JA. Lifetime costs of complications resulting from type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:476-481.

4. Bloomgarden ZT. The epidemiology of complications. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:924-932.

5. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA. 2001;285:182-189.

6. Menzin J, Langley-Hawthorne C, Friedman M, Boulanger L, Cavanaugh R. Potential short-term economic benefits of improved glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:51-55.

7. Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A, et al on behalf of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). BMJ. 2000;320:1373-1378.

8. Gilmer TP, O’Connor PJ, Rush WA, et al. Predictors of health care costs in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:59-64.

9. American Diabetes Association, American College of Cardiology. Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease Review. Redefining diabetes control. Issue 1. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/uedocuments/ DCVDissue1.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2004.

10. Adams K, Corrigan J. Priority Areas for Quality Improvement. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2005

11. Thorpe KE, Florence CS, Howard DH, Joski P. The impact of obesity on rising medical spending. Available at: http://content.healthaffairs,org/cgi/content/abstract/hlthaff.w4.480. Accessed December 19, 2004.

12. American Obesity Association. Why health plans should cover treatments for obesity. Available at: http://www.obesity.org/treatment/health_plans_cover.shtml. Accessed December 1, 2004.

Washington Post. Obesity gets part of blame for care costs. Available at: http://pgasb.pgarchiver.wm/washingtonpost/results.html?num=25&st=basic&uid=MAC=50a23aa1f3f5c6104e90e36051420d61&QryTxt=%Obesity+gets+part+of+blame+for+Care+Costs%22&sortby=REVERSE-CHRON&datetype=7. Accessed December 1, 2004.

14. Snyder JW, Malaskovitz J, Griego J, Persson J, Flatt K. Quality improvement and cost reduction realized by a purchaser through diabetes disease management. Dis Manag. 2003;6:233-241.


Return to top



Our sponsors | Privacy policy | Contact us
Quality Profiles is a program funded by Pfizer - click here to go to Pfizer.com
© 2008 by the National Committee for Quality Assurance